SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJARATNAM v. THE COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS


Rajaratnam V. The Commissioner Of Stamps

1938   Present : Soertsz J. and de Kretser A.J.

RAJARATNAM
v. THE COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS.

 192-D. C. Jaffna, 58.

Estate duty-Business carried on under vilasam-Admission of sons into partnership-No agreement in writing-Validity-Registration, of business-Death of father-Claim by sons of a gift of one-third share of partnership-Proof of gift-Ordinance No. 7 of 1840, s. 21 (4)-Estate Duty Ordinance, No.,8 of 1919, s. 8 (1) (c).

A person, who carried on business under the vilasam S. V., decided in 1929 to admit his two sons into partnership and registered the business under the business name S. V. The business was described as a partner ship, the partners being the father and the two sons. No written agreement of partnership was entered into. Although regular accounts were kept, there was no separate account of the capital of each partner nor was the distribution of profits and loss shown as against each partner.

In October, 1933, a document was executed declaring that they had been partners in the business. On the death of the father in December, 1933, it was claimed on behalf of the sons that S. V. had gifted a one-th































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top