BALASUBRAMANIAN PILLAI v. VALLIAPA CHETTIAR
1938 Present:
Hearne J. and Wijeyewardene A. J.
BALASUBRAMANIAN PILLAI v. VALLIAPA CHETTIAR.
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL LEAVE TO
APPEAL TO THE PRIVY COUNCIL.
286-D. C. Colombo, 4,520.
Privy Council-Application for
conditional leave-Notice of intended application When it should be given-Appeal
( Privy Council ) Ordinance, rule 2, schedule. 1.
Where an application for conditional leave is made under rule 2, schedule I of
Appeal (Privy Council) Ordinance, No. 31 of 1909, it is not imperative that the
respondent should receive notice of the intended application before it is filed.
THIS
was an application for conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council.
H. V. Perera, K. C. (with him S. Subramaniam), for the petitioner.
E. F. N. Gratiaen (with him J. A. T. Perera), for the respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
August 31, 1938. HEARNE J. -
This is an application for conditional leave to appeal to the Privy Council.
Judgment was entered by this Court on May 27, 1938, in S. C. 286 (F) D. C.
Colombo, 4,520; the judgment was a final judgment and the matter in dispute on
appeal is over Rs. 5,000 in value.
Two comm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.