SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WANIGASEKERE v. MUSTAPHA


Wanigasekere V. Mustapha

1938 Present: Wijeyewardene J.

WANIGASEKERE
v. MUSTAPHA.

215-P. C. Kurunegala, 56,144.

Milk-Adulterated milk kept on premises-Proof of exposure for sale-Essential for prosecution-Small Towns Sanitary Ordinance, No. 18 of 1892, s. 9E (2).

Where the accused was charged with exposing for sale or keeping on the premises of his tea boutique adulterated milk in breach of a by-law framed under section 9E (2) of the Small Towns Sanitary Ordinance, which was as follows : -

"No adulterated milk should be sold or offered or exposed for sale or kept on the premises of any eating-house or tea or coffee boutique.

For the purposes of this rule adulterated milk shall mean milk to which water or any other foreign liquid or substance has been added for the purpose of augmenting its quantity or enhancing its apparent quality?.

Held, that the prosecution was bound to prove that the adulterated milk was kept on the premises for purposes of sale.

Wijeyratne v. Abdulla (31 N. L. R. 310)
referred to.

APPEAL against an acquittal with the sanction of the Attorney-General.

F. C. W. VanGeyzel, for complainant, appellant.

Cyril E. S. Perera, for acc

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top