SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THORNTON et al. v. VELAITHAN CHETTY


Thornton Et Al. V. Velaithan Chetty

1938 Present: Maartensz and Moseley JJ.

THORNTON et al. v. VELAITHAN CHETTY.

79-D. C. Galle, 24,593.

Administrator-Right to continue action brought by predecessor in office-Legal representative summoned to defend action-Objection to be urged in first instance-Right of administrator to vindicate title to land-Civil Procedure Code, s. 404.

Under section 404 of the Civil Procedure Code a succeeding administrator may continue an action brought by his predecessor in office.

Where a person is summoned to defend an action as legal representative an objection that he is not the legal representative must be raised and determined in the first instance.

An administrator is entitled to bring an action to vindicate title to-immovable property belonging to the estate without joining the heirs unless the Court so directs.

APPEAL from an order of the District Judge of Galle declaring the substituted plaintiffs as administrators entitled to the premises of the intestate in place of the plaintiffs, whose letters had been recalled.

H. V. Perera, K. C. (with him E. B. Wikramanayake), for first substituted defendant, appellant. -An a























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top