THORNTON et al. v. VELAITHAN CHETTY
1938 Present:
Maartensz and Moseley JJ.
THORNTON et al. v. VELAITHAN CHETTY.
79-D. C. Galle, 24,593.
Administrator-Right to
continue action brought by predecessor in office-Legal representative summoned
to defend action-Objection to be urged in first instance-Right of administrator
to vindicate title to land-Civil Procedure Code, s. 404.
Under section 404 of the Civil Procedure Code a succeeding administrator may
continue an action brought by his predecessor in office.
Where a person is summoned to defend an action as legal representative an
objection that he is not the legal representative must be raised and determined
in the first instance.
An administrator is entitled to bring an action to vindicate title to-immovable
property belonging to the estate without joining the heirs unless the Court so
directs.
APPEAL
from an order of the District Judge of Galle declaring the substituted
plaintiffs as administrators entitled to the premises of the intestate in place
of the plaintiffs, whose letters had been recalled.
H. V. Perera, K. C. (with him E. B. Wikramanayake), for first
substituted defendant, appellant. -An a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.