KING v. KIRIWASTHU ET AL.
1939 Present:
Abrahams C. J., Hearne and Keuneman JJ.
THE KING v. KIRIWASTHU et al.
38-P. C. Matale, 22,162.
Evidence-Confession to Police
Officer-Inadmissible to prove that the accused contradicted himself-Criminal
Procedure Code, s. 122 (3)-Evidence Ordinance, s. 25.
A confession made to a Police Officer is inadmissible as proof against the
person making it whether as substantive evidence or in order to show that he has
contradicted himself.
THE
two accused were charged with having committed murder and with having caused
evidence of the commission of the offence of murder to disappear and tried
before a Judge and jury at the Midland Assizes. During the course of the trial
the Counsel for the second accused wanted to elicit from the second accused in
the course of his examination-in-chief portions of the statement made by him to
a Police Sergeant under section 122 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898. The
Counsel for the first accused suggested that the whole should be put to the
second accused. When the statement was put to him, he admitted portions of it
whilst he denied the rest. At the close of the defence the learned Jud
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.