SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAYMOND v. WIJEYWARDENE


Raymond V. Wijeywardene

1937 Present: Abrahams C. J. and Fernando J.

RAYMOND v. WIJEYWARDENE.

20-D. C. Kurunegala, 18,365.

Possessory action-Possession for a year and a day-Predecessor's possession- Dispossession by predecessor-Prescription Ordinance. No. 22 of 1871. s. 4.

In a possessory action the plaintiff is entitled, in calculating the essential period of a year and a day to take advantage of the possession of his predecessor in title, even though the person dispossessing him happens to be his predecessor in title.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge of Kurunegala.
 
H. V. Perera, K. C. (with him F. A. Tisseverasingam), for plaintiff, appellant.
 
F. A. Hayley, K. C. (with him Barr Kumarakulasingam), for defendants, respondents.

 Cur. adv. vult.

November 24, 1937. ABRAHAMS C. J. -

The plaintiff-appellant instituted this-action for the recovery of possession of a coconut estate of about a hundred acres in extent which was mortgaged to him by the defendants-respondents who all joined in the mortgage bond. What their various titles and interests were in the said estate did not emerge during the action, since the case was fought out entirely























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top