PERUMAL v. ARUMOGAM
1939 Present:
Soertsz A. C. J.
PERUMAL v. ARUMOGAM.
50-M. C. Badulla-Haldummulla, 9,990.
Mens rea-Charge of unlawful possession of ganja-Elements of
offence-Poisons, Opium, and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, s. 28 (Cap. 172.)
Where a person is charged under section 28 of the Poisons, Opium, and Dangerous
Drugs Ordinance, with having in his possession, without a licence from the
Governor, a preparation or extract from the hemp plant commonly known as ganja
or a resin obtained from the hemp plant.
Held, that mens rea was not an essential element of the offence.
Burah v. Mohamadu Sally (2. C. L. W. 381) and Casie Chetty v.
Ahamadu (18 N. L. R. 186) referred to.
APPEAL
from an acquittal by the Magistrate of Badulla-Haldummulla.
M. T. de S. Ameresekera, K. C., S. -G. (with him D. Jansze, C. C.),
for the complainant, appellant.
T. K. Curtis, for the accused, respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
July 25, 1939. SOERTSZ A. C.
J. -
The accused in this case was charged with having had in his possession, without
a licence from the Governor, a preparation of, or extract from, the hemp plant
commonly known as ganja, or a resin obtained from the hemp plant,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.