SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PERUMAL v. ARUMOGAM


Perumal V. Arumogam

1939 Present: Soertsz A. C. J.

PERUMAL v. ARUMOGAM.

50-M. C. Badulla-Haldummulla, 9,990.

 Mens rea-Charge of unlawful possession of ganja-Elements of offence-Poisons, Opium, and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, s. 28 (Cap. 172.)

Where a person is charged under section 28 of the Poisons, Opium, and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, with having in his possession, without a licence from the Governor, a preparation or extract from the hemp plant commonly known as ganja or a resin obtained from the hemp plant.
 
Held, that mens rea was not an essential element of the offence.

Burah v. Mohamadu Sally (2. C. L. W. 381) and Casie Chetty v. Ahamadu (18 N. L. R. 186) referred to.
 
APPEAL from an acquittal by the Magistrate of Badulla-Haldummulla.
 
M. T. de S. Ameresekera, K. C., S. -G. (with him D. Jansze, C. C.), for the complainant, appellant.
 
T. K. Curtis, for the accused, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

July 25, 1939. SOERTSZ A. C. J. -

The accused in this case was charged with having had in his possession, without a licence from the Governor, a preparation of, or extract from, the hemp plant commonly known as ganja, or a resin obtained from the hemp plant,



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top