SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. MACAN MARKAR
NLR41V73



Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Macan Markar

1939     Present. Hearne and de Kretser JJ.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. MACAN MARKAR

12-D. C. (Inty.) Special 

Income tax-Bonus to shareholder-Shares issued, as fully paid up, for capitalization of profits-Meaning of dividend-Income Tax Ordinance, s. 2 (Cap. 188.)

Fully paid up shares issued to the shareholder of a company by way of capitalizing the profits of the company do not constitute a dividend as defined by section 2 of the Income Tax Ordinance so as to render the shareholder liable to tax on their value.

THIS was a case stated by the Board of Review under section 74 of the Income Tax Ordinance.

The facts are stated as follows : -

Sir H. M. Macan Markar was notified in September, 1938, of an additional assessment of Rs. 68,712, in respect of the year of assessment, 1936-37, and was called upon to pay a tax of Rs. 3,280.05 on this additional assessment. The sum assessed was said to be a " dividend" received from The Galle Face Land & Building Company, Limited.

The Company is a private company and, except for five shareholders holding one share each, the entire capital is owned by four members of the appellant's family. In February, 1936, the Company resolved to use Rs. 250,000 out of its reserve fund for the payment of a bonus to shareholders, in proportion to the amount paid up on their shares, by the issue of 2,500 fully paid up shares of the Company of Rs. 100 each.

These 2,500 fully paid shares were duly issued to the four principal shareholders (except for 48 shares which were held for charity). The assessee received 793 shares.

The Income Tax Assessor was of the view that this distribution was a " dividend" as defined in section 2 of the Ordinance and as such was taxable in the hands of the recipient (except as to so many of the shares as represented profits arising in the accounting periods ended before April 1, 1936). The assessee was accordingly assessed to pay a tax on Rs. 68,712 in addition to the tax he had already been assessed for the year of assessment, 1936-37.

The assessee appealed to the Commissioner against the assessment on the ground that the distribution of shares was not a " dividend" within the meaning of the Income Tax Ordinance, and was accordingly not taxable.

The Commissioner referred the appeal to the Board of Review, under the provisions of section 72 of the Income Tax Ordinance. The appeal was heard by the Board of Review on November 14, 1938.

At the hearing it was agreed between the parties, that the undistributed profits of the Company had been capitalized and that as a result of the issue of all these bonus shares the capital of the Company had been

increased by Rs. 194,958 ; that the resolutions of the Company and of its Directors relative to the distribution of the reserves by the issue of shares were intra vires the Company ; and that these shares had been issued as fully paid shares. There is also no dispute on the amount of tax payable, if liability to tax attaches.

The assessee produced the balance sheet of the Company to the year ending June 30, 1935, (marke





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top