SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SOERTSZ, NIHILL, JJ
BROWNE – Appellant
Versus
DAVIS – Respondent


Advocates:
J. E. M. Obeyesekere (with him O. L. de Kretser Jr.), for the defendants, appellants.
H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him E. F. N. Gratiaen), for plaintiff-respond­ent.-

Browne V. Davis

1939     Present. Soertsz A.C.J. and Nihill J.



BROWNE v. DAVIS.

118-D. C. Nuwara Eliya, 2,099. 

Partnership-Action for dissolution-Right of partner to retire-Power of Court to order dissolution-No reasonable prospect of profit a good ground for dissolution-Partnership Act, 1890, ss. 53 and 54 Victori





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top