SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Howard, CJ, Moseley, J, SOERTSZ, J
KANAGASUNDERAM – Appellant
Versus
PODIHAMINE – Respondent


Advocates:
N. Nadarajah, H. H. Basnayake, C.C.

Kanagasunderam V. Podihamine

 

1940 Present : Howard C.J., Moseley S. P. J,
and Soertsz J.

 

KANAGASUNDERAM v. PODIHAMINE.


187-C. R, Avissawella, 20.


Appeal-Order of costs-Land Acquisition Ordinance, s. 31 (1) (Cap.
203).

 

There is no right of appeal to t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top