SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL.]
HOWARD, CJ, MOSELEY, J, CANNON, J
KING – Appellant
Versus
MOHOTTIHAMY – Respondent


Advocates:
C. Suntharalingam, for accused, appellant.
Nihal Gunasekera, C.C., for the Crown.-

King V. Mohottihamy

 

[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL.]

 

1941     Present: Howard C.J., Moseley S.P.J., and Cannon J.

 

THE KING v. MOHOTTIHAMY.

 

1- M. C. Ratnapura, 32,040.

 

" Deposition of witness-Proo













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top