SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Moseley, Keuneman, JJ
SUBRAMANIAMPILLAI – Appellant
Versus
WICKREMASEKERE et al – Respondent


Advocates:
N. Nadarajah, for plaintiff, appellant.
N. E. Weerasooria, K.C. (with him Cyril E. S. Perera), for defendant, respondent.

Subramaniampillai V. Wickremasekere Et Al.,

 

1941     Present: Moseley S.P J. and Keuneman J.

 

SUBRAMANIAMPILLAI v. WICKREMASEKERE  et al



130-D. C. Chilaw, 11,447.

 

Business Names Registration Ordinance (Cap. 120), ss. 4 (I) (d) and 9 (1) - Registration of



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top