SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VEERASINGHAM v. MEENATCHY


Veerasingham V. Meenatchy

1941 Present: Soertsz.J 

VEERASINGHAM v. MEENATCHY.

462-M. C. Jaffna, 15,264.

Public Servant-Surveyor employed by Fiscal obscuration to surrey -Motive of obstruction-Penal Code, s. 183.

A surveyor employed by the Fiscal to prepare a plan for the purpose of executing a Fiscal's conveyance in terms of section 286 of the Civil Procedure Code is a Public Servant within the meaning of section 183 of the Penal Code.

For the purpose of a conviction under the section the motive of the person obstructing is immaterial.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Magistrate of Jaffna.

P. Navaratnarajah, for the complainant, appellant.

M. Balasunderam, for the accused, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

November 13, 1941. SOERTSZ J.

This is an appeal, sanctioned by the Attorney-General, from an order made by the Magistrate of the Jaffna Court acquitting a person charged under section 183 of the Penal Code with obstruction to a public servant in the discharge of his public functions. The person obstructed was a

licensed surveyor. The occasion on which the obstruction took place was when on December 9, 1940, this officer went to survey a land which b












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top