SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHAMED et al. v. MOHAMED UVAIS


Mohamed Et Al., V. Mohamed Uvais

1942 Present: Wijeyewardene and Nihill JJ.

MOHAMED et al v. MOHAMED UVAIS.

277--D. C. Colombo. 10,036.

Trade Mark-Action for infringement and passing off-Distinct labels-Alleged phonetic similarity -Burden of proof-Injunction.

Where, in an action for the infringement of a trade mark, the label used by the defendants on their goods was distinct from and. incapable of being mistaken or confused with the label of the plaintiffs, the burden is upon the latter to establish by evidence that their goods are known by some name or description of such a nature that the use of the defendants label would cause people to think that the goods having that label were the goods of the plaintiff.

THIS was an action for infringement or a trade mark and for passing off in which the District Court granted an injunction restraining the defendant from the use of his unregistered trade mark. The plaintiffs, who were carrying on business in Colombo under the firm name of Vally Noor Mohamed & Company, alleged in their plaint that the defendants by the use of their unregistered trade mark had infringed their registered Trade Mark No. 6,867, which














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top