SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ABDUL CAFFOR et al. v. AHAMED et al.


Abdul Caffor Et Al. V. Ahamed Et Al.,

1942 Present: Hearne and Jayetileke JJ.

ABDUL CAFFOR et al v. AHAMED et al.

10-D. C. (Inty) Colombo, No.8 (Misc).

Trade Mark-Application for registration opposed-Grounds of opposition Refusal by Registrar on ground not taken-Appeal to District Court Failure to obtain leave to take new ground-Trade Marks ordinance (Cap. 121), s. 12 (8).

In an application for the registration of a trade mark, it is within the discretion of the Registrar acting on material that has been disclosed before him to refuse registration of a trade mark if, on such material, another ground of opposition could properly have been taken by those who opposed the registration.

In the event of an appeal to the District Court the Judge of that Court is entitled to examine only the gr6unds of opposition originally taken by the opponents unless at the instance of the Registrar or the opponents leave is obtained to argue the appeal before the District Court on a ground which was not included in the grounds of opposition on which the Registrar was originally invited to refuse the application.

APPEAL from an order of the District Judge of Colombo.

This w























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top