ABDUL CAFFOR et al. v. AHAMED et al.
1942 Present: Hearne and
Jayetileke JJ.
ABDUL CAFFOR et al v. AHAMED et al.
10-D. C. (Inty) Colombo, No.8 (Misc).
Trade Mark-Application for
registration opposed-Grounds of opposition Refusal by Registrar on ground not
taken-Appeal to District Court Failure to obtain leave to take new ground-Trade
Marks ordinance (Cap. 121), s. 12 (8).
In an application for the registration of a trade mark, it is within the
discretion of the Registrar acting on material that has been disclosed before
him to refuse registration of a trade mark if, on such material, another ground
of opposition could properly have been taken by those who opposed the
registration.
In the event of an appeal to the District Court the Judge of that Court is
entitled to examine only the gr6unds of opposition originally taken by the
opponents unless at the instance of the Registrar or the opponents leave is
obtained to argue the appeal before the District Court on a ground which was not
included in the grounds of opposition on which the Registrar was originally
invited to refuse the application.
APPEAL
from an order of the District Judge of
Colombo.
This w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.