PAKIAMPILLAI v. MERRY
1942 Present:
Wijeyewardene J.
PAKIAMPILLAI, Appellant,
and
MERRY, Respondent.
797-M. C. Colombo, 48,633.
Control of prices-Sale of
Maldive fish above controlled price-Contract of sale- Control of Prices
Ordinance, No. 39 of 1939, s. 3.
Where an accused person is charged with having sold Maldive fish at a price
above the maximum price fixed by the Controller of Prices, the prosecution is
not bound to prove a contract of sale enforceable by action within the meaning
of section 4 of the Sale of Goods Ordinance.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Magistrate of
Colombo.
N. Nadarajah, K.C. (with him H. W. Thambiah), for the accused, appellant.
G. E. Chitty, C.C., for the Crown, respondent.
November 10, 1942. WIJEYEWARDENE J.-
The accused-appellant was convicted on a charge of having sold Maldive fish
(mixed Kundira and Male) on August 31, 1942, at a price above the maximum price
fixed by the Controller of Prices, and sentenced to six months' rigorous
imprisonment.
Acting under the powers vested in him by section 3 of the Control of Prices
Ordinance, No. 39 of 1939, the Controller of Prices made and signed an order on
July 31, 1942, fixi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.