CANNON, J
ABEYWICKREME – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR TRANSPORT – Respondent
1941 Present : Cannon J.
ABEYWICKREME, Appellant, and COMMISSIONER OF
MOTOR TRANSPORT, Respondent.
In the matter of a case stated under section 4 (6) of the
Motor Car Ordinance,
Appeal No. 2,609.
Omnibus licence-Refusal of application for licence in a particular year- Change
of circumstances-Renewal of application-Motor Car Ordinance, No. 45 of 1938, s.
4 (6).
Where the Commissioner of Motor Transport refuses an application for an omnibus
licence for a particular year, he is not debarred from considering another
application by the same applicant for the same route during the same year where
the circumstances have changed and where there is room for an additional
omnibus.
THIS
was a case stated for the Supreme Court under section 4 (6) of the Motor
Car Ordinance, 1933.
H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him D. D. Atulathmudali), for objector, appellant.
H.
W. R. Weerasooriya, C.C., for the Commissioner of Motor Transport.
Cur. adv. vult.
December 17, 1941. CANNON J.-
This is an appeal by way of cases stated under section 4 (6) of the Motor Car
Ordinance, No. 45 of 1938, in which Ordinance is the law relating to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.