SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SIMON v. PERERA


Simon V. Perera

1943 Present: Hearne J.

SIMON,
Appellant, and PERERA (Inspector of Police) Respondent.

949-M. C. Panadure, 20,592.

Rubber Thefts Ordinance (Cap. 29), s. 16 (1)-Charge of being in possession of rubber reasonably suspected of being stolen-Essence of offence.

In a charge under section 16 (1) of the Rubber Thefts Ordinance of being in possession of rubber reasonably suspected of being stolen the essence of the offence is the inability of the person in possession to account satisfactorily for his possession.

Undue stress should not be placed on the grounds of suspicion of the police officer concerned.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Magistrate of Panadure.

K. W. E. Perera, for accused, appellant.

A. C. Alles, C.C., for complainant, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

February 11, 1943. HEARNE J.-

A Police Officer found the appellant in possession of 40 1b. of rubber which he suspected were stolen and he accordingly applied for a summons " to bring " him before a Magistrate. He was charged under section 16 (1) of the Rubber Thefts Ordinance and convicted.

My attention was drawn to a case decided by this Court Soysa v. Davith Singho1[ 29 N. L. R. 118










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top