SIMON v. PERERA
1943 Present: Hearne J.
SIMON, Appellant, and PERERA (Inspector of Police) Respondent.
949-M. C. Panadure, 20,592.
Rubber Thefts Ordinance (Cap.
29), s. 16 (1)-Charge of being in possession of rubber reasonably suspected of
being stolen-Essence of offence.
In a charge under section 16 (1) of the Rubber Thefts Ordinance of being in
possession of rubber reasonably suspected of being stolen the essence of the
offence is the inability of the person in possession to account satisfactorily
for his possession.
Undue stress should not be placed on the grounds of suspicion of the police
officer concerned.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Magistrate of
Panadure.
K. W. E. Perera, for accused, appellant.
A. C. Alles, C.C., for complainant, respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
February 11, 1943. HEARNE J.-
A Police Officer found the appellant in possession of 40 1b. of rubber which he
suspected were stolen and he accordingly applied for a summons " to bring " him
before a Magistrate. He was charged under section 16 (1) of the Rubber Thefts
Ordinance and convicted.
My attention was drawn to a case
decided by this Court Soysa v. Davith Singho1[ 29 N. L. R. 118
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.