SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DE SILVA A.J.M. v. MAGISTRATE.


De Silva, A.J.M. V. Magistrate.

1943 Present: de Kretser J.

A. J. M. DE SILVA v. MAGISTRATE, GAMPOLA, AND
POLICE: INSPECTOR HERAT.

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF Mandamus

IN M. C. GAMPOLA, 4,421

Writ of mandamus-Cas pending before Magistrate-Case instituted by Police-Right of complainant's proctor to appear-Criminal Procedure Code, s. 148 (1) (b).

Where proceedings are instituted in a Magistrate's Court on a report by a police officer under section 148 (1) (b), a police officer is not entitled to conduct the prosecution.

A proctor retained by the complainant has the right to appear for him and conduct the prosecution.

THIS was an application for a writ of mandamus on the Magistrate of Gampola.

H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him S. P. Wijeyewickreme) in support.

G. E. Chitty, C.C., as amicus curiae.

Cur. adv. vult.

July 7, 1943. DE KRETSER J.-

The point raised in this application is said to arise rather frequently in recent times, and both the Attorney-General's Department and members of the legal profession are anxious that it should be authoritatively decided. I was inclined, therefore, to have the case sent up before

a Divisional Benc





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top