RODRIGO ET AL. v. EBRAHIM
1943 Present: Howard C.J. and Wijeyewardene J.
RODRIGO et al. Appellants, and EBRAHIM, Respondent.
182-D. C. Colombo, 9,517.
Novation-Agreement to substitute one debtor for another-Promise to pay debt of
another-New consideration-Prevention of Frauds Ordinance (Cap. 57), s. 18.
Where, by agreement, one debtor is substituted for another with the consent of
the creditor there is a novation of the debt and such an agreement falls outside
the scope of section 18 of the Prevention of Frauds Ordinance.
Where the promise to pay the debt of another is based upon a new consideration
such an undertaking is regarded as an original promise and is not within the
section.
Fernando v. Abeyegoonesekera (34 N. L. R. 160) followed.
APPEAL
from a judgment
of the District Judge of Colombo.
H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him C. Thiagalingam and C. Ranganathan), for the
defendants, appellants 2A and 2B.
N. E. Weerasooria, K.C. (with him E. G. Wickremanayake), for the plaintiff,
respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
October 5, 1943. HOWARD C.J.-
This is an appeal from a decision of the District Judge of Colombo, entering
judgment for the plaintiff as claim
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.