WEERASEKERE v. SUBRAMANIAM
1948 Present:
Wijeyewardene J.
WEERASEKERE, Appellant, and SUBRAMANIAM, Respondent.
541- M. C. Matale, 771.
Control of Prices-Control of
Sulphapyridine tablets-Sale of single tablets and not a bottle-Control of Prices
Ordinance, No. 39 of 1939, s. 3.
Where the accused was charged with the sale of 8 Sulphapyridine tablets at 50
cents a tablet, a price in excess of the maximum price, in breach of an order
made under section 3 of the Control of Prices Ordinance,-
Held, that the accused had not offended against the provisions of the order as
the article controlled was a bottle of tablets and not single tablets.
Held, further, that the obligation to issue a receipt arose only in respect of a
controlled article.
Section 340 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is applicable only to cases in
which a party has no right of appeal except on a point of law.
Solicitor-Genera! v. Perera (17 N.L.R. 413) followed.
APPEAL
from a conviction by the Magistrate of
Matale. .
S, Nadesan, for petitioner.
E. H. T. Gunasekera, C.C., for the Attorney-General.
Cur. adv. vult.
October 8, 1943. WIJEYEWARDENE
J.-
The accused was charged on two counts : -
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.