SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KANDIAH et al. v. TAMBIPILLAI


Kandiah Et Al. V. Tambipillai

1943 Present: Howard C.J. and Keuneman J.

KANDIAH et al,
Appellants, and TAMBIPILLAI. Respondent.

288-D. C. Batticaloa, 126.

Agreement to marry-Covenant to give dowry-Covenant to pay liquidated damages-Divisibility of covenants-Doctrine of severance.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, sued the defendant, who is uncle of the second plaintiff upon an agreement, which contained the following clauses :-

(1) The first plaintiff should marry the second plaintiff within six months of the execution of the agreement;

(2) That the defendant in consideration of the said marriage should give in dowry to the plaintiff's the premises specified therein and Rs. 300 on the date of their marriage, and Rs. 200 on the execution of the said agreement;

(3) In the event of the defendant failing to give the second plaintiff in marriage to the first plaintiff, the defendant should pay to the first plaintiff the sum of Rs. 500 as and by way of liquidated damages ;

(4) In the event of the first plaintiff failing, refusing or neglecting to marry the second plaintiff, the first plaintiff should pay to the defendant the sum of Rs. 500 as and by way of



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top