Chief Justice: Howard, Justice: Keuneman
NADAR v. FONSEKA
1943 Present: Howard
C.J. and Keuneman J.
NADAR, Appellant, and FONSEKA, Respondent.
346-D. C. Chilaw, 11,687.
Agreement to pay money-Promise
implied by terms of document-Acknowledgment of debt-Prescription Ordinance (Cap.
55) s. 6.
A document in which the defendant states that he has " borrowed and received in
full from--, the sum of Rs. 275 of lawful money of Ceylon, having promised
to pay interest at the rate of 15 per cent, per annum until the sum is paid in
full" contains an implied promise to pay the sum borrowed and is a contract,
agreement or bargain to pay money within the meaning of section 6 of the
Prescription Ordinance.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Judge of
Chilaw. The facts appear from the head-note and the argument.
N. Nadarajah, K.C. (with him E. B. Wickremenayake), for the plaintiff,
appellant.-Document P 1 constitutes a contract in writing and the period of
limitation is six years, under section 6 of the Prescription Ordinance (Cap.
55). There is a clear acknowledgment of debt and an implied promise to pay. See
Urban District Council, Matale v. Sellaiyah[ (1931) 33 N. L. R. 14.] Sonnadara
v. Weerasinghe[ (193
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.