SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. MARTIN


King V. Martin

[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL]

1944
Present: Keuneman, de Kretser and Wijeyewardene JJ.

THE KING v. MARTIN.

99-M. C. Avissawella, 85,184.

Sentence-Leave to appeal-Conviction for rape-Sentence of whipping-Sentence substituted for original sentence--Court of Criminal Appeal Ordinance, No. 28 of X938, s. 4 (c).

Where the accused who was convicted at the Assizes of robbery and rape was sentenced to ' five years' rigorous imprisonment in - addition to 10 lashes, and where as the sentence of whipping could not be carried out an additional sentence of imprisonment was imposed by the trial Judge acting under section 818 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code,-

Held, that the accused could not be granted leave to appeal against the sentence passed in substitution for the original sentence.

THIS was an application for leave to appeal against a sentence.

No appearance for applicant.

E. H. T. Gunasekera, C.C., for the Crown.

Cur. adv. vult.

June 26, 1944. KEUNEMAN J.-

This is an application for leave to appeal against sentence made to the Court of Criminal Appeal under unusual circumstances. On September 7, 1943, the prisoner was found guilty at the Assizes







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top