KING v. MARTIN
[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL]
1944 Present: Keuneman, de Kretser and Wijeyewardene JJ.
THE KING v. MARTIN.
99-M. C. Avissawella, 85,184.
Sentence-Leave to appeal-Conviction for
rape-Sentence of whipping-Sentence substituted for original sentence--Court of
Criminal Appeal Ordinance, No. 28 of X938, s. 4 (c).
Where the accused who was convicted at the Assizes of robbery and rape was
sentenced to ' five years' rigorous imprisonment in - addition to 10 lashes, and
where as the sentence of whipping could not be carried out an additional
sentence of imprisonment was imposed by the trial Judge acting under section 818
(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code,-
Held, that the accused could not be granted leave to appeal
against the sentence passed in substitution for the original sentence.
THIS was an application for
leave to appeal against a sentence.
No appearance for applicant.
E. H. T. Gunasekera, C.C., for the Crown.
Cur. adv. vult.
June 26, 1944. KEUNEMAN J.-
This is an application for leave to appeal against sentence made to the Court of
Criminal Appeal under unusual circumstances. On September 7, 1943, the prisoner
was found guilty at the Assizes
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.