SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PERUMAL v. HARDING


Perumal V. Harding

1944 Present: Moseley S.P.J. and Wijeyewardene J.

PERUMAL,
Appellant, and HARDING, Respondent.

164-D. C. Galle,  38,843.

Trust-Claim to recover property-Constructive trust treated as express trust- Prescription-Trusts Ordinance (Cap. 72) ".111 (I) (b).

The plaintiff as cestui que trust of a constructive trust sued the defendant for declaration of title to an immovable property. The defendant had purchased the property with notice of the trust from the trustee within ten years of the institution of the action.

Held, that the provisions of section 111 (1) (b) of the Trusts Ordinance read with section 111 (5) operated against the defendant relying on the possession' of the trustee in support of his prescriptive title, as the trust was a constructive trust which would be treated as an express trust under the Law of England.

APPEAL. from a judgment of the District Judge of Galle.

H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him N. E. Weerasooria, K.C, and Peri Sunderam), for the defendant, appellant.

N. Nadarajah, K.C. (with him N. Kumarasingham), for plaintiff, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

June 15, 1944. WIJEYEWARDENE J.-

The plaintiff-respondent filed thi






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top