PERUMAL v. HARDING
1944 Present: Moseley S.P.J. and
Wijeyewardene J.
PERUMAL, Appellant, and HARDING, Respondent.
164-D. C. Galle, 38,843.
Trust-Claim to recover
property-Constructive trust treated as express trust- Prescription-Trusts
Ordinance (Cap. 72) ".111 (I) (b).
The plaintiff as cestui que trust of a constructive trust sued the defendant
for declaration of title to an immovable property. The defendant had purchased
the property with notice of the trust from the trustee within ten years of the
institution of the action.
Held, that the provisions of section 111 (1) (b) of the Trusts
Ordinance read with section 111 (5) operated against the defendant relying on
the possession' of the trustee in support of his prescriptive title, as the
trust was a constructive trust which would be treated as an express trust under
the Law of England.
APPEAL. from a judgment of
the District Judge of Galle.
H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him N. E.
Weerasooria, K.C, and Peri Sunderam), for the defendant, appellant.
N. Nadarajah, K.C. (with him N. Kumarasingham), for plaintiff,
respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
June 15, 1944. WIJEYEWARDENE J.-
The plaintiff-respondent filed thi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.