SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WEERASINGHE v. AZEEZ


Weerasinghe V. Azeez

1944 Present: de Kretser J.

WEERASINGHE,
Appellant, and AZEEZ, Respondent.

85-C. R. Colombo, 93,747.

Rent restriction-Order of Court of Requests-Right of appeal-Ordinance No. 60 of 1942, s. 8.

The existing right of appeal from a judgment of the Court of requests is not affected by the Rent Restriction Ordinance.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Commissioner of Requests, Colombo.

E. B. Wikremanayake, for appellant.

G. Thomas, for respondent.

July 21, 1944. DE KRETSER J.-

A preliminary objection was taken to the hearing of this appeal on the ground that no appeal lay and the remarks of Soertsz J. in C. R. Colombo, 93.851, Supreme Court Minutes, July 17, 1944, were read to me. These remarks were made obiter and now an objection has been taken expressly. Section 12, sub-section (12) definitely says that the order of the Board of Assessment shall be final and conclusive. When we turn to section 8, that section does not give the right to the landlord to sue the tenant for ejectment. That is a right which he has independent of the Ordinance. What that, section does is to curb his right and to limit it to certain circumstances.

In my opinion

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top