WEERASINGHE v. AZEEZ
NLR45V381
1944 Present: de Kretser J.
WEERASINGHE, Appellant, and AZEEZ, Respondent.
85-C. R. Colombo, 93,747.
Rent restriction-Order of Court of
Requests-Right of appeal-Ordinance No. 60 of 1942, s. 8.
The existing right of appeal from a judgment of the Court of requests is not
affected by the Rent Restriction Ordinance.
APPEAL from a judgment of the
Commissioner of Requests, Colombo.
E. B. Wikremanayake, for appellant.
G. Thomas, for respondent.
July 21, 1944. DE KRETSER J.-
A preliminary objection was taken to the hearing of this appeal on the
ground that no appeal lay and the remarks of Soertsz J. in C. R. Colombo,
93.851, Supreme Court Minutes, July 17, 1944, were read to me. These remarks
were made obiter and now an objection has been taken expressly. Section 12,
sub-section (12) definitely says that the order of the Board of Assessment shall
be final and conclusive. When we turn to section 8, that section does not give
the right to the landlord to sue the tenant for ejectment. That is a right which
he has independent of the Ordinance. What that, section does is to curb his
right and to limit it to certain circumstances.
In my opinion, therefore, the right of appeal
which existed previously is not affected by the Ordinance and I decided to hear
the appeal. .Having read the evidence and heard Counsel I find no reason to
differ from the conclusion arrived at by the learned Commissioner.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Appeal dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.