SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOLAGODA v. MOLAGODA


Molagoda V. Molagoda

1944 Present: Howard C.J. and Wijeyewardene J.

MOLAGODA,
Appellant, and MOLAGODA, Respondent.

4-D. C. Kandy, 1,129.

Sale-Action to recover purchase price-Recital in deed that money was received- Defendant's plea that sale was, in fact, a gift.

When the plaintiff sued the defendant to recover the consideration due on a deed of transfer of property, which contained an express recital " that-the transferor had received the purchase price in full",-

Held, that it was open to the defendant to prove by oral evidence that the deed of transfer was, in fact; a deed of gift. .

PLAINTIFF, as administrator of the estate of one Kambuwatawana sued the defendant to recover a sum of Rs. 1,600. By deed P 1 of August 9, 1940, Kambuwatawana conveyed certain lands to defendant for Rs. 2,000. Plaintiff instituted this action to recover the consideration due on the deed but claimed only a sum of Rs. 1,600 giving credit to the defendant for a sum of Rs. 400 due to him as an heir of the estate. The defendant pleaded that deed P 1, was in reality a deed of gift. The learned District Judge held that the defendant was debarred from relying on oral evidence to



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top