MOLAGODA v. MOLAGODA
1944 Present: Howard C.J. and
Wijeyewardene J.
MOLAGODA, Appellant, and MOLAGODA, Respondent.
4-D. C. Kandy, 1,129.
Sale-Action to recover purchase
price-Recital in deed that money was received- Defendant's plea that sale was,
in fact, a gift.
When the plaintiff sued the defendant to recover the consideration due on a deed
of transfer of property, which contained an express recital " that-the
transferor had received the purchase price in full",-
Held, that it was open to the defendant to prove by oral evidence
that the deed of transfer was, in fact; a deed of gift. .
PLAINTIFF, as administrator
of the estate of one Kambuwatawana sued the defendant to recover a sum of Rs.
1,600. By deed P 1 of August 9, 1940, Kambuwatawana conveyed certain lands to
defendant for Rs. 2,000. Plaintiff instituted this action to recover the
consideration due on the deed but claimed only a sum of Rs. 1,600 giving credit
to the defendant for a sum of Rs. 400 due to him as an heir of the estate. The
defendant pleaded that deed P 1, was in reality a deed of gift. The learned
District Judge held that the defendant was debarred from relying on oral
evidence to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.