GANY v. HAY
1944 Present: HOWARD C.J. and de
Kretser J.
GANY, Applicant, and HAY, Respondent.
23-D.C., Kandy, 170.
Insolvency-certificate of
conformity-Application to revise order allowing certificate - delay on
part of creditor-Withholding of facts-Insolvency Ordinance (Cap.88) ss. 133 and
137.
An application by a creditor under section 133 of the Insolvency Ordinance
to revise an order allowing a certificate to an insolvent may be refused where
the application has been unduly delayed and where the applicant has been guilty
of a conspiracy of silence regarding facts within his knowledge.
Semble where an insolvent opposes a claim made against him, the
certificate granted to him would be of no avail to him upon proof of the facts
stated in section 127.
APPEAL from an
order of the District Judge of Kandy.
H.V. Perera, K.C. (with him A. Seyed Ahamed), for the proved creditor,
appellant.
No appearance for the insolvent, respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
October 25, 1944. DE KRETSER J.-
After the insolvent had been granted a certificate of the third class on May 15,
1942, and after his assets had been distributed, the appellant, who was one of
the earliest credit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.