KING v. GEEKIYANAGE JOHN SILVA
[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL.]
1945 Present : Howard C.J., Keuneman and Jayetileke,
JJ.
THE KING v. GEEKIYANAGE JOHN SILVA.
84-M. C. Panadure 27,675.
Accused's failure to give evidence-Charge of murder-Judge's direction that
failure to give evidence is an element that may be considered-Proof of case
beyond reasonable doubt-Principle to be applied.
Where in a charge of murder the presiding Judge directed the jury " that the
failure of the accused to give evidence was an element that they may take into
consideration in discussing whether the Crown has proved the case beyond all
reasonable doubt- ",
Held, that there was no misdirection in law.
The King v. Duraisamy (43 N. L. R. 241) distinguished.
It is within the discretion of a Judge to comment on the failure of an accused
person to give evidence and the Court of Criminal Appeal will not generally
interfere with that discretion.
The comments of the Judge on an accused's failure to give evidence should be
confined to those cases in which there are special circumstances which an
accused only can explain and which therefore call for an explanation by him. The
failure of an accus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.