SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAVANNA MANA EYANNA & CO. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX


Ravanna Mana Eyanna & Co., V. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

1915 Present: Jayetileke and Rose JJ.

RAVANNA MANA EYANNA & CO.,
Appellant, and THE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
Respondent.

S. C. No. 85-Appeal against an Assessment of Excess Profits Duty.

Excess Profits Duty-Determination of capital of a business-Claim to deduct bad debts-Meaning of " debts due "-Excess Profits Duty Ordinance, No. 38 of 1941, s. 10 (1) (b).

In computing the capital of a business, bad and doubtful debts for which a reduction has not been claimed or allowed under section 9 (1) (d) of the Income Tax Ordinance are regarded as debts due to the business within the meaning of section 10 (1) (b) of the Excess Profits Duty Ordinance.

A debt, though it is prescribed, can be regarded as still due; the. expression " debts due " should not be read in a limited sense as meaning debts, the payment of which can be enforced by action.

APPEAL against an assessment of Excess Profits Duty, under section 13 of the Excess Profits Duty Ordinance, No. 38 of 1941.

N. Nadarajah, K.C. (with thin N. Kumarasingham), for the assessees,. appellants.-To determine the capital of a business all bad debts should



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top