KING v. CROOS et al.
[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL.]
1945 present: Keuneman Wijeyewardene and
Jayetileke JJ.
THE KING v. CROOS et al.
1-M. C. Colombo, 27,483.
Court of Criminal Appeal-Verdict
of culpable homicide not justified-Grave and sudden provocation-No common
intention-Attempt to commi culpable homicide substituted in the case of 2nd
accused.
The two accused were indicted for murder and convicted of culpable homicide. On
the Judge's direction " If there was grave and sudden provocation, the offence
would be culpable homicide not amounting to murder. If there was no grave and
sudden provocation, it would be a case of murder itself " the Jury brought in a
verdict of culpable homicide not amounting to murder against the 2nd accused.
There was no evidence that the injury inflicted by the 2nd accused, although it
was intended to kill, endangered life or contributed to the death of the
deceased
The death of the deceased had in fact been caused by an injury inflicted by the
1st accused between whom and the 2nd accused there was mo common intention
established.
Held, that a verdict of " Guilty of an attempt to commit culpable homicide not
amounting to murder
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.