EDWIN PERERA v. BISSO MENIKA
1945 Present: Wijeyewardene J.
EDWIN PERERA, Appellant, and BISSO MENIKA, Respondent..
95-M. C. Kandy, 15,420.
Maintenance-Application by wife-Invitation by husband to come back- Refusal of
wife-False allegation of adultery-Sufficient reason.
Where, in an application
for maintenance by a wife against her husband, the applicant refused an
invitation by the respondent to go back to him,
Held, that a false allegation of adultery made by the respondent against the
applicant was a sufficient excuse for her refusal.
APPEAL
from an order of the Magistrate of Kandy.
Cyril E. S. Perera (with S. W. Jayasuriya and E. P. Wijetunge), for defendant,
appellant.
No appearance for the applicant, respondent.
March 21, 1945. WIJEYEWARDENE J.-
The applicant is the wife of the respondent and has two children aged five and
two years. The applicant claimed maintenance in this action for herself and the
younger child only, as the respondent had removed the elder child when she was
in hospital.
This action was filed in July, 1944. Summons could not be served on the
defendant till October. He appeared in Court in October and " invited her back "
to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.