SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

APPUHAMY v. WIJESINGHE


Appuhamy V. Wijesinghe

1945 Present: Wijeyewardene J.

APPUHAMY,
Appellant, and WIJESINGHE, Inspector of
Police,
Respondent.

745-M. C, Gampaha, 22,648.

Punishment-Charge of causing hurt with knife-Accused, a youth-Duty: of Magistrate to consider advisability of acting under chapter 26 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The Magistrate, while sentencing the accused, aged 19, to 3 months' rigorous imprisonment for causing hurt with knife, said, " Of late knifing has increased considerably and it is, therefore, necessary to put it down with a firm hand ". The accused's offence fell, in fact, under section 325 of the Penal Code, and not under section 315.

Held, that the Magistrate should have paid heed to the salutary principles underlying the statutory provisions made for the release of offenders on probation under chapter 26 of the Criminal Procedure-Code.

APPEAL from a conviction by the Magistrate of Gampaha.

E. B. Wikremanayake (with him H. Wanigatunge), for the accused, appellant.

E. H. T. Gunasekere, CC., for the Crown, respondent.

Cut. adv. vult.

February 9, 1945. WIJEYEWARDENE J.-

The accused was convicted on charges of causing hurt to one Jamis and committ












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top