MITCHELL v. FERNANDO et al.
1945 Present: Howard
C.J. and Keuneman J.
MITCHELL, Appellant, and FERNANDO et al., Respondents.
344-D. C. Colombo, 731.
Mortgage-Shares in
Company-Delivery of scrip-Delivery of possession-Cession of right-Sale in
execution against mortgagor-Knowledge of mortgage-Title of Fiscal's
transferee-Action on mortgage bond- Roman-Dutch law.
The first and second defendants mortgaged shares in a Company with the plaintiff
by bond and deposited the share certificates with the plaintiff along with the
bond. While the shares were under mortgage the third defendant purchased the
shares in execution of a money decree against the first and second defendants
and obtained Fiscal's conveyance. Thereafter the shares were registered in the
Company's, register under the name of the third defendant.
Held (In an action on the bond by the plaintiff), that delivery of the share
certificates was not sufficient evidence of the effective delivery of the shares
mortgaged. The possession of the share certificates did not give to the
plaintiff such control and direction of the shares-mortgaged as to be equivalent
to possession in law of the shares mortgaged.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.