SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PERERA v. PERERA


Perera V. Perera

1945 Present: Cannon J.

PERERA,
Appellant, and PERERA, Respondent.

1,324-M. C. Negombo, 41,504.

Lottery-Charge ,of keeping place of lottery-Evidence of habitual user necessary-Penal Code, s. 288.

Where the accused was charged, under section 288 of the Penal Code, with keeping a place for the purpose of drawing a lottery-

Held, that, to constitute " keeping ", there must be evidence of some habitual user of the premises for the purpose alleged.

APPEAL against a conviction by the Magistrate of Negombo

H. W. Jayewardene for the accused, appellant.

A. C. Ameer, CC., for the Attorney-General.

July 19, 1945. CANNON J.-

On the evidence in this case it is possible that the accused committed an offence, but the question for consideration is whether that offence was the one charged. He was charged with keeping a place, to wit, a house situated at Kimbulapitiya, for the purpose of drawing a lottery contrary to section 288 of the Penal Code. The Magistrate convicted him and sentenced him to 6 months' rigorous imprisonment. Evidence was given that he had printed in Colombo over 100,000 lottery tickets and that in his house were found some books of l





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top