KING v. SATHASIVAM et al.
[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL]
1945 Present: Wijeyewardene, Cannon and Rose JJ,
THE KING v. SATHASIVAM et al.
38-41-M.C. Jaffna, 6,291.
Court of Criminal Appeal-No presumption of innocence in favour of witnesses when
allegations are made against them-A rider brought by Jury should be
spontaneous-Offence of causing death by doing an act with the knowledge that
death is likely to result-Failure of Judge to give proper directions-Effect of
misdirections in summing-up-Penal Code, ss. 33, 293.
Five persons were charged with murder. The first accused was acquitted and the
second, third, fourth and fifth accused were convicted of culpable homicide not
amounting to murder.
The deceased died of gun-shot injuries. There were no eye-witnesses as to the
actual shooting, but shortly before and after four shots were heard and he
deceased fell the second, third, fourth and fifth accused were seen in the
vicinity. On the day following the night of the incident the police found four
empty cartridge cases at a distance of over 80 yards from the spot where the
deceased fell. These empty cartridges were, according to the opinion of an
expert witness ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.