SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WIJEYEWARDENE, J
SIVANATHAN – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
Accused-appellant in person.
E. L. W. de Zoysa, CC., for the Attorney-General.

Sivanathan V. Inspector Of Police

1945 Present: Wijeyewardene J.

SIVANATHAN,

Appellant, and INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
SLAVE ISLAND,
Respondent.

1,027-M. C. Colombo, 6,186.

Evidence-Of unsavoury nature-No ground for rejection where it is necessary.

Indecency of evidence is no objection to its being received where it i" necessary to the decision of a case.

APPEAL against a conviction by the Magistrate of Colombo.

Accused-appellant in person.

E. L. W. de Zoysa, CC., for the Attorney-General.

Cur. adv. vult.

September 25, 1945. WIJEYEWARDENE J.-

The accused was convicted on a charge of cheating one Ramabadaran in respect of a sum of Rs. 490 and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment and two year's Police supervision. The accused has a bad record. He was sentenced to receive a number of cuts on four occasions after 1940 and was sent to the Maggona Reformatory for two years in 1943. These facts do not, of course, relieve a Court from the duty of examining the evidence in a case against the accused and ascertaining whether the particular charge preferred against him in that case is proved.

In view of the somewhat peculiar features of this case, I have read ce













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top