APPUHAMY v. MARTIN ET AL.
1945 Present: Soertsz A.C.J., Wijeyewardene, Cannon, Rose and
Canekeratne JJ.
APPUHAMY, Appellant, and MARTIN et al, Respondents.
251-D. C. Matara, 8,950.
Ordinance relating to Claims to Forest, Chena, Waste and Unoccupied Lands,
No. 1 of 1897, s. 4 (2)-Order of Special Officer-Binding in rem-
Meaning of words " final and conclusive ".
Held by Soertsz A.C.J., Cannon, Rose, and Canekeratne JJ. (Wijeyewardene J.
dissenting):-
Proceedings under the Ordinance relating to Claims to Forest, Chena, Waste and
Unoccupied Lands, No. 1 of 1897, are proceedings in rem, and an order embodying
an agreement or admission and falling under section 4 (2) of that Ordinance
gives to the claimants mentioned in the order a title good against all others,
including the claimants who failed to appear before the Special Officer.
The ruling in Kiri Menika v. Appuhamy (1916) 19 N.. L. R. 298,
followed, and the modification of it in Gunasekera v. Silva (1917)
4 C. W. R. 226 and Dingiri Banda v. Podi Bandara (1927) 29 N. L. R.
357, not followed.
THIS
was a case referred by Howard C.J. to a Bench of five Judges under section
51 of the Courts Ordinance.
A tract
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.