KING v. APPUSAMY et al.
[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL.]
1945 Present: Keuneman S.P.J., Rose and Canekeratne JJ.
THE KING v. APPUHAMY et al.
Applications 162-165-M. C. Rakwana, 41,871
Court of Criminal Appeal-Charge of murder-Several accused-Common
intention-Requirements of a proper direction on-Penal Code, s. 32.
The four applicants were found guilty of murder.
On the question of common intention the directions of the trial Judge were such
as to indicate that while " murderous intention " was necessary to be proved in
respect of the person who was shown to have caused the death of the deceased, in
the case of his associates any form of common criminal intention would suffice
to render them guilty of the same offence-
Held, that the Judge should have emphasized to the Jury that, under section 32
of the Penal Code, to support the charge of murder the common intention must
itself be a " murderous intention " within the meaning of section 294 of the
Penal Code, and that if the common intention was something less, e.g., to cause
grievous hurt, the persons who shared that common intention would be only guilty
of the lesser offence.
APPLICATIONS
for leave to appeal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.