SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SARAM APPUHAMY v. RANNIE


Saram Appuhamy V. Rannie

1946 Present : Jayetileke J.

SARAM APPUHAMY AND RANNIE.

940-M.C. Kegalla, 6, 417.

Maintenance-Supposed resemblance of children to father-Evidence-Unsafe guide.

It is not safe to decide paternity in a maintenance case on the alleged resemblance of the children to the respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Magistrate of Kegalla.

             H. V. Perera, K. C. (with him S. P. M. Rajendran), for the defendant, appellant.

           R. N. Illangakoon, for the applicant, respondent.,

January 23, 1946. JAYETILEKE J.-

Mr. H. V. Perera contended that the Magistrate has erred on two points. He invited my attention to the following passage in the Judgment:-

(1) ?Accordign to the defendant?s evidence he states that he sent the petition D 1 to the A. G. A., Kegalla, against Punchietana in which he makes allegation against Punchietana and wants the A. G. A. to punish Punchietana for the offence for which his brother Undiya had been mistakenly punished. The defendant states that it is after this petition that the applicant abused him in the Hettimulla Bazaar, that he filed a case against the application for the abuse and that this maintena



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top