RANASINGHE v. SIRIMANNA
1946 Present:
Howard C. J.
RANASINGHE, Appellant, and SIRIMANNA, Respondent.
76- M. C. Chilaw, 23, 343.
Evidence Ordinance, s. 112-
Meaning of ?access to the mother? ? Legitimacy of child born during subsistence
of marriage.
The word ?access? in section112 of the Evidence Ordinance
means no more than opportunity of intercourse.
Per HOWARD C. J. ??in view of this decision [Karapaya
Servai v. Mayandi A. I. T. 1934 P. C. 49] the judgment of the Full Bench in
Jane Nona v. Leo (25 N. L. r. 241) that the word ?access? in section 112
of the Evidence Ordinance is used in the sense of ?actual intercourse? and not
?possibility of access? or ?opportunity for intercourse? can no longer be
regarded as binding authority?.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Magistrate?s Court of Chilaw.
H. W. Jayewardene, for the defendant, appellant.
No appearance for the applicant, respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
March 18, 1946. HOWARD C.J.-
The appellant in this case appeals from a judgment of the
Magistrate?s Court of Chilaw holding that he is the father of the children (1)
Ethelreda, (2) Hector, and (3) Alreda and direction him to pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.