KUMARAVEL NADAR V. et al v. SOKKALAL
1939 Present:
Soertsz A.C.J. and Wijeyewardene J.
KUMARAVEL NADAR et al., Appellants, and SOKKALAL RAM,
Respondent.
116- D. C. Colombo, 6,138.
Trade Marks-Action for infringement by proprietor of trade mark-Prior user of similar trade mark by defendant- Honest concurrent user also-Effect of ?Trade Marks Ordinance (Cap.121), ss. 40,19.
The proprietor of
a registered mark is not entitled to prevent the user of a similar trade mark by
a person who has had continuous user of it from an anterior date within the
meaning of section 40 of the Trademarks Ordinance. Nor can he oppose its
registration by the other person where there has been honest concurrent user
within the meaning of section 19 of the Ordinance.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court of Colombo. The plaintiff filed this
action against the defendants in November,1936, alleging that the defendants had
infringed two trade marks (P 1and P 2) registered by him in 1930 and 1934 in
respect of beedies and passed off beedies of the plaintiff?s manufacture as and
for the plaintiff?s beedies. The defendants filed answer pleading prior user and
honest concurrent use
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.