SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

FERNANDO v. PEIRIS


Fernando V. Peiris

1946 Present : Jayetileke and Canekeratne JJ.

FERNANDO, Appellant, and PEIRIS Respondent

88- D. C. ( Inty.) Chilaw, 2,324.

Will ? Undue influence
   
Where a testator, when he was seriously ill, executed a will devising and bequeathing to his wife all his property and the validity of  the will  was challenged on the ground of undue influence the only evidence in support of the plea being that at the time of the execution of the will  the wife was present and was weeping-
   
Held
, that the court was not entitled to presume that the wife exercised under influence on the testator.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge of Chilaw.

               L. A. Rajapakse,
K. C. (with him C. S. Barr Kumarakulasinghe and  T. B. Dissanayaka), for the petitioner, appellant.-

The doctrine of influence is taken over from the English Law. We have adopted it. It is a doctrine applicable to transactions inter Vivos, e. g. ,conveyances, deed of gifts, &c.

This is a case of a Last Will.

No such doctrine is applicable in the case of Last Wills. The existence of a fiduciary relationship or active  confidence does not create any presumption of undue influ





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top