SITI KADIJA et al v. DE SARAM et al
[ IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL ]
1946 Present:
Viscount Simon, Lord Thankerton and Sir John Beaumont.
SITTI KADIJA et al., Appellants, and DE SARAM et al.,
Respondents.
PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL NO. 39 OF 1945.
S.C. 211- D.C. Colombo, 2,025
Fidei commissum ? Last will of
Muslim- Difficulty of construction no impediment id fidei commissum was
intended- Difference between fidei commissum and trust.
Where a will left by a Muslim contained the following clauses: -
? I do hereby will and desire that my wife. ? . . . . and my
children . . . . . and my father . . . . . . . who are the lawful heirs and
heiresses of my estate shall be entitled to and take their respective shares
according to my religion and Shafie sec.? to which I belong, but they nor their
heirs shall not sell, mortgage or alienate any of the lands, houses,
estates or gardens belonging to me at present or which I might acquire
hereafter, and they shall be held in trust for the grandchildren of my
children and the grandchildren of my heirs and heiresses only that they may
receive the rents income and produce of the said lands, houses, gardens and
estates without encumbe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.