SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GNANANDA THERO v. VILLAGE HEADMAN OF MADAKOTUWA


Gnananda Thero V. Village Headman Of Madakotuwa

1946  Present: Soertsz S. P. J.

GNANANDA THERO, Appellant, and VILLAGE HEADMAN
OF MADAKOTUWA, Respondent.

32-M. C. Gampaha, 29,201.

Requisitioning order-Competent authority-His power to delegate authority-Defence (Miscellaneous) Regulation 37 (1).
   
The responsibility entrusted to the competent authority under regulation 37 (1) of the Defence (miscellaneous) Regulations cannot be delegated by him to a subordinate officer.

APPEAL from a conviction from the Magistrate?s Court, Gampaha. The accused was charged with having failed to deliver to the headman paddy requisitioned by the Assistant Government Agent, in contravention of an order of requisitioning made under regulation 37 (1) of the Defence (miscellaneous) Regulations. It transpired in evidence that the competent authority (the Assistant Government Agent) had issued a blank Requisition Form, signed by him, to subordinate officer and that the particulars in the Form were subsequently filled in by the subordinate officer.

                  L. A. Rajapakse, K. C. ( with him M. M. K. Subramaniam ), for the accused, appellant.

                  J. G. T.





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top