ABDUL HAMEED v. KALMUNAI
1946 Present:
Cannon J.
ABDUL HAMEED Appellant, and KALMUNAI POLICE,
Respondent.
310-M. C. Kalmunai, 164.
Surety for appellant--Forfeiture
of bond-Powers of Court-Criminal Procedure Code, as. 341, 411.
A surety bound himself on behalf of an appellant ?that he
(the appellant) shall attend at the Magistrate?s Court after the proceedings in
the case shall have been returned to the said Magistrate?s Court from the
Supreme Court on appeal and there surrender himself . . . . and abide sentence
which shall have been pronounced against him . . . ?
The appeal was duly heard and dismissed, and the accused
attended the Magistrate?s Court on April 23, 1945, when the Supreme Court
decision was communicated to him. He was subsequently given time to pay the fine
which was due from him. Thereafter the accused did not appear, and the
Magistrate ordered the surety?s bond to be forfeited.
Held, that the terms of the surety?s bond were
fulfilled when the accused appeared on April 23, 1945, and that the surety?s
liability came to an end on that date.
Held, further, that section 341 of the Criminal
Procedure Code does not. enable a bond to be taken if
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.