KING v. KARTHIGESU
[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL.]
1946 Present: Cannon J. (President), Jayetileke and Canekeratne JJ.
THE KING v. KARTHIGESU.
14-M. C. Chavakachcheri, 22,852.
Evidence-First information to
Police-Must not be based on hearsay- Informant must be called as
witness-Evidence Ordinance, s. 157-Criminal Procedure Code, s. 121-Court of
Criminal Appeal Ordinance, proviso to s. 5 (1).
The rule for the admissibility, under section 157 of the Evidence Ordinance, of
first informations given under section 121 of the Criminal Procedure Code may be
said to be this : first of all, the information must not be based on hearsay,
unless the hearsay matter is relevant to explain conduct; secondly, the
informant must be called as a witness, unless the evidence is tendered under
section 32 of the Evidence Ordinance.
The proviso to section 5(1) of the Court of Criminal Appeal Ordinance, that the
Court of Criminal Appeal may dismiss an appeal if they consider that no
substantial miscarriage of justice has actually occurred, assumes a case where a
reasonable jury, after being properly directed, would, on the evidence properly
admissible, without doubt, convict.
APPEAL
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.