SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. KARTHIGESU


King V. Karthigesu

[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL.]
1946 Present: Cannon J. (President), Jayetileke and Canekeratne JJ.

THE KING v. KARTHIGESU.

14-M. C. Chavakachcheri, 22,852.

Evidence-First information to Police-Must not be based on hearsay- Informant must be called as witness-Evidence Ordinance, s. 157-Criminal Procedure Code, s. 121-Court of Criminal Appeal Ordinance, proviso to s. 5 (1).

The rule for the admissibility, under section 157 of the Evidence Ordinance, of first informations given under section 121 of the Criminal Procedure Code may be said to be this : first of all, the information must not be based on hearsay, unless the hearsay matter is relevant to explain conduct; secondly, the informant must be called as a witness, unless the evidence is tendered under section 32 of the Evidence Ordinance.

The proviso to section 5(1) of the Court of Criminal Appeal Ordinance, that the Court of Criminal Appeal may dismiss an appeal if they consider that no substantial miscarriage of justice has actually occurred, assumes a case where a reasonable jury, after being properly directed, would, on the evidence properly admissible, without doubt, convict.

APPEAL

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top