SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KING v. PEDRICK SINGHO


King V. Pedrick Singho

[COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL.]

1946 Present: Howard C.J. (President), Cannon and Jayetileke JJ.

THE KING v. PEDRICK SINGHO.

APPLICATION 73 of 1946.

S.C. 3-M. C. Panadure, 3,620.

Joinder of three charges of murder in one indictment- Offences committed in same transaction-Separate trials not necessary where no prejudice is caused to accused-Criminal Procedure Code, 88. 179 (1), 180 (1).

 Where three charges of murder were joined in one indictment and the facts of the three murders were so interwoven as to constitute a series of facts forming one transaction-
   
Held
, that the accused was not prejudiced by the joinder of more than one charge of murder in the same indictment.

APPLICATION for leave to appeal against a conviction in a trial before the Supreme Court.

Mackenzie Pereira (with him K. A. P. Rajakaruna), for applicant.- Three charges of murder were included in one indictment. The Crown sought to justify the joinder (a) under Section 179, (b) under Section 180 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Section 180 does not apply because neither continuity of action nor community of purpose so as to make the alleged series of acts one tr





























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top