MUTUWA et al v. ALBERT
1946 Present: de
Silva J.
MUTUWA et at., Appellants, and ALBERT, Respondent.
269-C. B. Matale, 8,486.
Court of Requests-Appearance of
defendants on day specified in Summons- Duty of Court to call upon them to
admit or deny plaintiff?s clam-Civil Procedure Code, s. 809.
Where, in an action in a Court of Requests, some of the defendants appeared oil
the day specified in tin summons hut did not want to file answer-
Held, that the defendants should have been called upon
to either admit or done the plaintiff?s claim in accordance with the provisions
of section 809 of the Civil Procedure Code.
APPEAL
from an order of the Commissioner of Requests, Matale.
G. T. Samarawickreme (with him Thor Misso), for the
defendants, appellants.
S. R. Wijayatilake, for the plaintiff, respondent.
March 6, 1946. DE SILVA J.-
In this case there has been an entire failure to observe the
procedure laid down in section 809 of the Civil Procedure Code.
The plaintiff instituted this action against four defendants
to recover a sum of Rs. 198 alleged to be due to him as his share of certain
trees which had been cut down by the defendants. Summ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.