SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PERERA v. PODISINGHO


Perera V. Podisingho

1946 Present: Howard C.J

PERERA, Appellant, and PODISINGHO et al., Respondents.

132-C. B. Panadure, 9,881.

Co-owners-Erection of building on common land by one co-owner-Protesting co-owner?s right to obtain mandatory order for demolition-Joiner of other co-owners as parties-Not a condition precedent.

The defendant built a house on the common land without the consent of the plaintiff, a co-owner, and depriving the. latter of her right to put up a building on the road frontage.
    
Held,
that, that when one co-owner has erected a house on t o common land without the consent of another co-owner the latter can obtain a mandarin order for the demolition of the building. There is no rule of law that, in such a case, the plaintiff should join all the other co-owner of the land as parties.

De Silva v. Karaneris (1978) 10. L. Rec. 28, followed.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Commissioner of Requests of Panadure

H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him U. A. Jayasundere and L. C. Weeramantry), for the defendant, appellant.

G. P. J. Kurukulasuriya (with him C. Dias), for the plaintiffs, respondents. -

Cur. adv. vult.

July 3, 1946. HOWARD C.J.-
   
The







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top